Detecting conflicting summary statistics in likelihood-free inference
Yinan Mao, Xueou Wang, David J. Nott, Michael Evans

TL;DR
This paper introduces regression-based diagnostic methods to detect conflicts within summary statistics used in likelihood-free Bayesian inference, aiding in model assessment and improvement.
Contribution
It develops novel diagnostic tools based on regression approaches to identify conflicting information in summary statistics for likelihood-free inference.
Findings
Methods successfully detect conflicts in summary statistics.
Application demonstrates improved model understanding.
Guides better summary statistic selection.
Abstract
Bayesian likelihood-free methods implement Bayesian inference using simulation of data from the model to substitute for intractable likelihood evaluations. Most likelihood-free inference methods replace the full data set with a summary statistic before performing Bayesian inference, and the choice of this statistic is often difficult. The summary statistic should be low-dimensional for computational reasons, while retaining as much information as possible about the parameter. Using a recent idea from the interpretable machine learning literature, we develop some regression-based diagnostic methods which are useful for detecting when different parts of a summary statistic vector contain conflicting information about the model parameters. Conflicts of this kind complicate summary statistic choice, and detecting them can be insightful about model deficiencies and guide model improvement.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
