
TL;DR
This paper introduces a causal framework for multi-level fairness, addressing biases at both individual and macro levels, and demonstrates its importance and effectiveness in reducing unfairness in real-world predictions.
Contribution
It formalizes multi-level fairness using causal inference tools and shows how neglecting macro-level biases leads to residual unfairness, proposing mitigation strategies.
Findings
Residual unfairness occurs if macro-level sensitive attributes are ignored.
Incorporating multi-level attributes reduces unfairness in income prediction.
The approach effectively mitigates bias in real-world tasks.
Abstract
Algorithmic systems are known to impact marginalized groups severely, and more so, if all sources of bias are not considered. While work in algorithmic fairness to-date has primarily focused on addressing discrimination due to individually linked attributes, social science research elucidates how some properties we link to individuals can be conceptualized as having causes at macro (e.g. structural) levels, and it may be important to be fair to attributes at multiple levels. For example, instead of simply considering race as a causal, protected attribute of an individual, the cause may be distilled as perceived racial discrimination an individual experiences, which in turn can be affected by neighborhood-level factors. This multi-level conceptualization is relevant to questions of fairness, as it may not only be important to take into account if the individual belonged to another…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsCausal inference
