The Dragonfly Wide Field Survey. II. Accurate Total Luminosities and Colors of Nearby Massive Galaxies and Implications for the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function
Tim B. Miller, Pieter van Dokkum, Shany Danieli, Jiaxuan Li, Roberto, Abraham, Charlie Conroy, Colleen Gilhuly, Johnny P. Greco, Qing Liu, Deborah, Lokhorst, Allison Merritt

TL;DR
This study uses the Dragonfly Wide Field Survey to accurately measure the total luminosities and colors of nearby massive galaxies, revealing systematic differences from previous methods that impact stellar mass estimates and galaxy number densities.
Contribution
It introduces a minimally dependent method for measuring total luminosities and colors of massive galaxies, improving accuracy over traditional SDSS-based methods.
Findings
Galaxies are brighter in r band by ~0.05 mag
Galaxies are bluer in g-r by ~0.06 mag
Stellar mass estimates decrease by ~7% compared to previous methods
Abstract
Stellar mass estimates of massive galaxies are susceptible to systematic errors in their photometry, due to their extended light profiles. In this study we use data from the Dragonfly Wide Field Survey (DWFS) to accurately measure the total luminosities and colors of nearby massive galaxies. The low surface brightness limits of the survey ( 31 mag arcsec on a one arcmin scale) allows us to implement a method, based on integrating the 1-D surface brightness profile, that is minimally dependent on any parameterization. We construct a sample of 1188 massive galaxies with based on the Galaxy Mass and Assembly (GAMA) survey and measure their total luminosities and colors. We then compare our measurements to various established methods applied to imaging from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), focusing on those favored by the GAMA…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
