IllustrisTNG and S2COSMOS: possible conflicts in the evolution of neutral gas and dust
Jenifer S. Millard, Benedikt Diemer, Stephen A. Eales, Haley L. Gomez,, Rosemary Beeston, Matthew W. L. Smith

TL;DR
This study compares observed and simulated galaxy dust evolution, revealing significant discrepancies in dust mass function evolution and dust-to-stellar mass ratios, highlighting potential limitations in current galaxy formation models.
Contribution
It introduces a combined empirical and simulation-based approach to study galactic dust evolution and identifies conflicts between observations and IllustrisTNG predictions.
Findings
Observed dust mass functions evolve rapidly at low redshift.
Simulations show little evolution in dust mass functions.
Discrepancies suggest limitations in current galaxy evolution models.
Abstract
We investigate the evolution in galactic dust mass over cosmic time through i) empirically derived dust masses using stacked submillimetre fluxes at 850um in the COSMOS field, and ii) dust masses derived using a robust post-processing method on the results from the cosmological hydrodynamical simulation IllustrisTNG. We effectively perform a self-calibration of the dust mass absorption coefficient by forcing the model and observations to agree at low redshift and then compare the evolution shown by the observations with that predicted by the model. We create dust mass functions (DMFs) based on the IllustrisTNG simulations from 0 < z < 0.5 and compare these with previously observed DMFs. We find a lack of evolution in the DMFs derived from the simulations, in conflict with the rapid evolution seen in empirically derived estimates of the low redshift DMF. Furthermore, we observe a strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
