MXB1659-298: The Fastest Spinning Millisecond Pulsar
Nicholas Kuechel, Marcus Teter, Andrew C. Liebmann, Sachiko Tsuruta

TL;DR
This paper clarifies that observed signals in NuSTAR data are due to detector dead time, emphasizing the need for caution in timing analysis of such data rather than reporting a new pulsar discovery.
Contribution
It demonstrates that signals previously thought to be oscillations are actually detector dead time effects, highlighting limitations of standard timing methods with NuSTAR.
Findings
Detected signals are caused by detector dead time.
Standard timing methods are unreliable with NuSTAR data.
No new pulsar discovered.
Abstract
We do not present the discovery of strong nearly coherent oscillations (NCOs) at 890.44 Hz for the low mass X-ray binary MXB 1659-298. We find that what we are detecting is dead time in the NuSTAR detectors. Instead consider this paper as further evidence for why standard timing methods should not be used with NuSTAR data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
