A bi-directional approach to comparing the modular structure of networks
Daniel Straulino, Mattie Landman, Neave O'Clery

TL;DR
This paper introduces a bi-directional method to compare the modular structures of networks by assessing how well each network's community partition fits the other's connectivity, incorporating network topology into the comparison.
Contribution
It presents a novel bi-directional distance measure that accounts for network structure and is compatible with various community detection algorithms.
Findings
The method effectively captures differences in community strength and structure.
It can identify similarities in underlying community structures despite dissimilar partitions.
Demonstrated on both simulated and real-world networks.
Abstract
Here we propose a new method to compare the modular structure of a pair of node-aligned networks. The majority of current methods, such as normalized mutual information, compare two node partitions derived from a community detection algorithm yet ignore the respective underlying network topologies. Addressing this gap, our method deploys a community detection quality function to assess the fit of each node partition with respect to the other network's connectivity structure. Specifically, for two networks A and B, we project the node partition of B onto the connectivity structure of A. By evaluating the fit of B's partition relative to A's own partition on network A (using a standard quality function), we quantify how well network A describes the modular structure of B. Repeating this in the other direction, we obtain a two-dimensional distance measure, the bi-directional (BiDir)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
