Two Candidate High-Redshift X-ray Jets Without Coincident Radio Jets
Daniel Schwartz (1), Aneta Siemiginowska (1), Brad Snios (1), Diana, Worrall (2), Mark Birkinshaw (2), C. C. Cheung (3), Herman Marshall (4),, Giulia Migliori (5), John F. C. Wardle (6), Doug Gobeille (7) ((1), Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of two high-redshift quasars with X-ray jets that lack coincident radio jets, suggesting that such X-ray jets may be common at high redshifts due to inverse Compton scattering of the CMB.
Contribution
It presents the first evidence of high-redshift X-ray jets without radio counterparts, expanding understanding of jet emission mechanisms at early cosmic times.
Findings
Detected extended X-ray emission aligned with radio features.
X-ray jets could be common at high redshifts due to CMB effects.
These are among the first high-redshift quasars with X-ray jets lacking radio counterparts.
Abstract
We report the detection of extended X-ray emission from two high-redshift radio quasars. These quasars, J1405+0415 at =3.208 and J1610+1811 at =3.118, were observed in a Chandra snapshot survey selected from a complete sample of the radio-brightest quasars in the overlap area of the VLA-FIRST radio survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The extended X-ray emission is located along the line connecting the core to a radio knot or hotspot, favoring the interpretation of X-ray jets. The inferred rest frame jet X-ray luminosities from 2--30 keV would be of order 10 erg~s if emitted isotropically and without relativistic beaming. In the scenario of inverse Compton scattering of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), X-ray jets without a coincident radio counterpart may be common, and should be readily detectable to redshifts even beyond 3.2 due to the (1+)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
