Characterizing and Comparing COVID-19 Misinformation Across Languages, Countries and Platforms
Golshan Madraki, Isabella Grasso, Jacqueline Otala, Yu Liu, Jeanna, Matthews

TL;DR
This study analyzes COVID-19 misinformation across multiple languages, countries, and social media platforms, revealing cultural, political, and regulatory differences that influence misinformation's nature and spread.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive cross-cultural, multilingual comparison of COVID-19 misinformation on social media, highlighting the influence of politics and government restrictions.
Findings
Misinformation varies significantly across languages and countries.
Politics is a primary root of COVID-19 misinformation.
Government restrictions impact misinformation dissemination differently.
Abstract
Misinformation/disinformation about COVID-19 has been rampant on social media around the world. In this study, we investigate COVID-19 misinformation/ disinformation on social media in multiple languages - Farsi (Persian), Chinese, and English, about multiple countries - Iran, China, and the United States (US), and on multiple platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Weibo, and WhatsApp. Misinformation, especially about a global pandemic, is a global problem yet it is common for studies of COVID-19 misinformation on social media to focus on a single language, like English, a single country, like the US, or a single platform, like Twitter. We utilized opportunistic sampling to compile 200 specific items of viral and yet debunked misinformation across these languages, countries and platforms emerged between January 1 and August 31. We then categorized this collection based both on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
