Towards a self-consistent analysis of the anisotropic galaxy two- and three-point correlation functions on large scales: application to mock galaxy catalogues
Naonori S. Sugiyama, Shun Saito, Florian Beutler, Hee-Jong Seo

TL;DR
This paper presents a method for joint analysis of anisotropic galaxy two- and three-point correlation functions to improve cosmological parameter constraints, demonstrated on mock catalogues with significant gains in Hubble parameter precision.
Contribution
It introduces a practical formalism for combined anisotropic 2PCF and 3PCF analysis, including modeling and uncertainty treatment, enhancing cosmological information extraction from galaxy surveys.
Findings
Joint 2PCF and 3PCF analysis improves Hubble parameter constraints by 20-30%.
Density field reconstruction enhances BAO signal in 2PCF but not in 3PCF.
The anisotropic 3PCF adds valuable cosmological information beyond the 2PCF alone.
Abstract
We establish a practical method for the joint analysis of anisotropic galaxy two- and three-point correlation functions (2PCF and 3PCF) on the basis of the decomposition formalism of the 3PCF using tri-polar spherical harmonics. We perform such an analysis with MultiDark Patchy mock catalogues to demonstrate and understand the benefit of the anisotropic 3PCF. We focus on scales above , and use information from the shape and the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signals of the 2PCF and 3PCF. We also apply density field reconstruction to increase the signal-noise ratio of BAO in the 2PCF measurement, but not in the 3PCF measurement. In particular, we study in detail the constraints on the angular diameter distance and the Hubble parameter. We build a model of the bispectrum or 3PCF that includes the nonlinear damping of the BAO signal in redshift space. We carefully…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
