A Physics-Guided Neural Network Framework for Elastic Plates: Comparison of Governing Equations-Based and Energy-Based Approaches

TL;DR

This paper develops a physics-guided neural network framework to model elastic plates, comparing PDE-based and energy-based approaches, demonstrating that energy-based loss offers advantages in simplicity and efficiency while maintaining accuracy.

Contribution

The study introduces a neural network framework incorporating physical laws for elastic plates, comparing different loss formulations, and highlighting the benefits of an energy-based approach.

Findings

All three approaches accurately model elastic deformation when trained properly.

Energy-based loss simplifies hyperparameter tuning and improves computational efficiency.

The framework effectively predicts deformation under various loading conditions.

Abstract

One of the obstacles hindering the scaling-up of the initial successes of machine learning in practical engineering applications is the dependence of the accuracy on the size of the database that "drives" the algorithms. Incorporating the already-known physical laws into the training process can significantly reduce the size of the required database. In this study, we establish a neural network-based computational framework to characterize the finite deformation of elastic plates, which in classic theories is described by the F\"oppl--von K\'arm\'an (FvK) equations with a set of boundary conditions (BCs). A neural network is constructed by taking the spatial coordinates as the input and the displacement field as the output to approximate the exact solution of the FvK equations. The physical information (PDEs, BCs, and potential energies) is then incorporated into the loss function, and a pseudo dataset is sampled without knowing the exact solution to finally train the neural network. The prediction accuracy of the modeling framework is carefully examined by applying it to four different loading cases: in-plane tension with non-uniformly distributed stretching forces, in-plane central-hole tension, out-of-plane deflection, and buckling under compression. \hl{Three ways of formulating the loss function are compared: 1) purely data-driven, 2) PDE-based, and 3) energy-based. Through the comparison with the finite element simulations, it is found that all the three approaches can characterize the elastic deformation of plates with a satisfactory accuracy if trained properly. Compared with incorporating the PDEs and BCs in the loss, using the total potential energy shows certain advantage in terms of the simplicity of hyperparameter tuning and the computational efficiency.