Breaking unidirectional invasions jeopardizes biodiversity in spatial May-Leonard systems
D. Bazeia, B.F. de Oliveira, J.V.O. Silva, A. Szolnoki

TL;DR
This paper investigates how reversing invasion directions in May-Leonard models affects biodiversity, showing that such reversals can lead to extinction of coexistence and alter species dominance dynamics.
Contribution
It reveals that breaking unidirectional invasions in May-Leonard systems disrupts coexistence and eliminates the survival of the weakest effect, contrasting with Lotka-Volterra models.
Findings
Reversing invasion direction can cause species coexistence to collapse.
The probability of extinction to a uniform state is non-monotonous.
Weakened invasion rates allow prey species to expand, influencing final outcomes.
Abstract
Non-transitive dominance and the resulting cyclic loop of three or more competing species provide a fundamental mechanism to explain biodiversity in biological and ecological systems. Both Lotka-Volterra and May-Leonard type model approaches agree that heterogeneity of invasion rates within this loop does not hazard the coexistence of competing species. While the resulting abundances of species become heterogeneous, the species who has the smallest invasion power benefits the most from unequal invasions. Nevertheless, the effective invasion rate in a predator and prey interaction can also be modified by breaking the direction of dominance and allowing reversed invasion with a smaller probability. While this alteration has no particular consequence on the behavior within the framework of Lotka-Volterra models, the reactions of May-Leonard systems are highly different. In the latter case,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
