Violation of Bell quantum probability inequalities with classical fields
Laura Ares, Alfredo Luis

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that classical fields can violate Bell inequalities when probabilities are used, suggesting such violations may stem from detector quantum effects rather than the fields themselves.
Contribution
It introduces a novel Bell-like criterion for classical fields and shows violations occur for both entangled and separable states, challenging the quantum-exclusive interpretation.
Findings
Classical fields can violate Bell inequalities via probabilities.
Violations occur for both entangled and separable states.
A new Bell-like criterion distinguishes factorized from entangled states.
Abstract
Violations of Bell inequalities in classical optics have been demonstrated in terms of field mean intensities and correlations, however, the quantum meaning of violations point to statistics and probabilities. We present a violation of Bell inequalities for classical fields in terms of probabilities, where we convert classical-field intensities into probabilities via the standard photon-counting equation. We find violation for both, entangled and separable field states. We conclude that any obtained quantum effect might be fully ascribed to the quantum nature of the detector rather than the field itself. Finally, we develop a new Bell-like criterion which is satisfied by factorized states and it is not by the entangled state.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
