Global HI asymmetries in IllustrisTNG: a diversity of physical processes disturb the cold gas in galaxies
Adam B. Watts, Chris Power, Barbara Catinella, Luca Cortese, Adam R.H., Stevens

TL;DR
This study uses the IllustrisTNG simulations to analyze the origins of asymmetries in the neutral hydrogen profiles of galaxies, revealing multiple physical processes contribute to these asymmetries beyond environmental effects.
Contribution
It demonstrates that various physical processes, not just environment, cause HI asymmetries in galaxies within cosmological simulations, aligning with observational findings.
Findings
Over 50% of simulated galaxies show at least 10% flux asymmetry.
Satellite galaxies are more asymmetric than centrals, especially in massive groups.
Ram pressure and other physical processes drive HI asymmetries in both central and satellite galaxies.
Abstract
Observations of the cold neutral atomic hydrogen (HI) in and around disc galaxies have revealed that spatial and kinematic asymmetries are commonplace, and are reflected in the global HI spectra. We use the TNG100 box from the IllustrisTNG suite of cosmological simulations to study the conditions under which these asymmetries may arise in current theoretical galaxy formation models. We find that more than 50% of the sample has at least a 10% difference in integrated flux between the high- and low-velocity half of the spectrum, thus the typical TNG100 galaxy has an HI profile that is not fully symmetric. We find that satellite galaxies are a more asymmetric population than centrals, consistent with observational results. Using halo mass as a proxy for environment, this trend appears to be driven by the satellite population within the virial radius of haloes more massive than $10^{13}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
