Valid t-ratio Inference for IV
David S. Lee, Justin McCrary, Marcelo J. Moreira, Jack Porter

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the common F > 10 threshold for IV t-ratio inference is anti-conservative, proposing corrected thresholds and a new test to improve inference accuracy in econometric analysis.
Contribution
It derives the correct F threshold for valid t-ratio inference in IV models and introduces the tF procedure for F-dependent critical values.
Findings
F > 10 threshold is anti-conservative for 5% tests
Corrected thresholds significantly alter previous significance conclusions
Introduces the tF procedure for more accurate inference
Abstract
In the single IV model, current practice relies on the first-stage F exceeding some threshold (e.g., 10) as a criterion for trusting t-ratio inferences, even though this yields an anti-conservative test. We show that a true 5 percent test instead requires an F greater than 104.7. Maintaining 10 as a threshold requires replacing the critical value 1.96 with 3.43. We re-examine 57 AER papers and find that corrected inference causes half of the initially presumed statistically significant results to be insignificant. We introduce a more powerful test, the tF procedure, which provides F-dependent adjusted t-ratio critical values.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsForecasting Techniques and Applications
