Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline IV: Completeness of the DR25 Planet Candidate catalog
Jessie L. Christiansen, Bruce D. Clarke, Christopher J. Burke, Jon M., Jenkins, Stephen T. Bryson, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Susan E. Mullally, Joseph D., Twicken, Natalie M. Batalha, Joseph Catanzarite, AKM Kamal Uddin, Khadeejah, Zamudio, Jeffrey C. Smith, Christopher E. Henze

TL;DR
This paper empirically evaluates the detection efficiency of the Kepler pipeline for planet candidate identification, revealing high overall detection rates and dependencies on stellar and observational parameters, crucial for accurate exoplanet occurrence rates.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive empirical measurement of Kepler pipeline detection efficiency across various parameters, improving the accuracy of exoplanet occurrence rate calculations.
Findings
Detection efficiency averages 90-95% for strong signals.
Detection efficiency weakly depends on the number of transits and orbital period.
Detection efficiency is more strongly influenced by stellar temperature and noise properties.
Abstract
In this work we empirically measure the detection efficiency of Kepler pipeline used to create the final Kepler Threshold Crossing Event (TCE; Twicken et al. 2016) and planet candidate catalogs (Thompson et al. 2018), a necessary ingredient for occurrence rate calculations using these lists. By injecting simulated signals into the calibrated pixel data and processing those pixels through the pipeline as normal, we quantify the detection probability of signals as a function of their signal strength and orbital period. In addition we investigate the dependence of the detection efficiency on parameters of the target stars and their location in the Kepler field of view. We find that the end-of-mission version of the Kepler pipeline returns to a high overall detection efficiency, averaging a 90-95% rate of detection for strong signals across a wide variety of parameter space. We find a weak…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
