Causal inference for semi-competing risks data
Daniel Nevo, Malka Gorfine

TL;DR
This paper introduces new causal inference methods for semi-competing risks data, addressing the challenges of dual event times and proposing estimands, assumptions, and estimation techniques that account for the time-to-event nature.
Contribution
It proposes alternative non time-varying estimands, a weaker assumption than monotonicity, and develops estimation methods for right-censored semi-competing risks data.
Findings
Partial identifiability results established
Sensitivity analysis framework proposed
Non-parametric and semi-parametric estimators developed
Abstract
An emerging challenge for time-to-event data is studying semi-competing risks, namely when two event times are of interest: a non-terminal event time (e.g. age at disease diagnosis), and a terminal event time (e.g. age at death). The non-terminal event is observed only if it precedes the terminal event, which may occur before or after the non-terminal event. Studying treatment or intervention effects on the dual event times is complicated because for some units, the non-terminal event may occur under one treatment value but not under the other. Until recently, existing approaches (e.g., the survivor average causal effect) generally disregarded the time-to-event nature of both outcomes. More recent research focused on principal strata effects within time-varying populations under Bayesian approaches. In this paper, we propose alternative non time-varying estimands, based on a single…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
