A note on the orientation covering number
Barnab\'as Janzer

TL;DR
This paper proves that the orientation covering number of any graph equals that of a complete graph with the same chromatic number, and explicitly determines this number for most sizes of complete graphs.
Contribution
It establishes the equality of the orientation covering number between a graph and the complete graph with the same chromatic number, resolving a previously posed question.
Findings
Proves (G)=(K_{\u03b7(G)}) for all graphs G.
Determines (K_n) explicitly for most n.
Confirms the conjecture by Esperet, Gimbel, and King.
Abstract
Given a graph , its orientation covering number is the smallest non-negative integer with the property that we can choose orientations of such that whenever are vertices of with then there is a chosen orientation in which both and are oriented away from . Esperet, Gimbel and King showed that , where is the chromatic number of , and asked whether we always have equality. In this note we prove that it is indeed always the case that . We also determine the exact value of explicitly for `most' values of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
