Device-independent quantum key distribution from computational assumptions
Tony Metger, Yfke Dulek, Andrea Coladangelo, Rotem Arnon-Friedman

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new DIQKD protocol that remains secure even if device components communicate arbitrarily, replacing the no-communication assumption with a computational assumption from post-quantum cryptography.
Contribution
It replaces the no-communication assumption in DIQKD with a computational assumption, enabling security against communicating devices under standard cryptographic assumptions.
Findings
Secure keys generated despite quantum communication between device parts
Protocol relies on computational hardness during execution, but achieves information-theoretic security at the end
Advances practical implementation of DIQKD by relaxing communication constraints
Abstract
In device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD), an adversary prepares a device consisting of two components, distributed to Alice and Bob, who use the device to generate a secure key. The security of existing DIQKD schemes holds under the assumption that the two components of the device cannot communicate with one another during the protocol execution. This is called the no-communication assumption in DIQKD. Here, we show how to replace this assumption, which can be hard to enforce in practice, by a standard computational assumption from post-quantum cryptography: we give a protocol that produces secure keys even when the components of an adversarial device can exchange arbitrary quantum communication, assuming the device is computationally bounded. Importantly, the computational assumption only needs to hold during the protocol execution -- the keys generated at the end of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
