Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey
Simon Caton, Christian Haas

TL;DR
This survey reviews various approaches to fairness in machine learning, categorizing methods into pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing, and discusses challenges across different learning tasks.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview and organization of fairness mitigation techniques in machine learning, including diverse methods and open challenges.
Findings
Categorizes fairness approaches into three main stages.
Includes discussion on fairness in various learning paradigms.
Summarizes open challenges and dilemmas in fairness research.
Abstract
As Machine Learning technologies become increasingly used in contexts that affect citizens, companies as well as researchers need to be confident that their application of these methods will not have unexpected social implications, such as bias towards gender, ethnicity, and/or people with disabilities. There is significant literature on approaches to mitigate bias and promote fairness, yet the area is complex and hard to penetrate for newcomers to the domain. This article seeks to provide an overview of the different schools of thought and approaches to mitigating (social) biases and increase fairness in the Machine Learning literature. It organises approaches into the widely accepted framework of pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing methods, subcategorizing into a further 11 method areas. Although much of the literature emphasizes binary classification, a discussion of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
