A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects
Amir-Hossein Karimi, Gilles Barthe, Bernhard Sch\"olkopf, Isabel, Valera

TL;DR
This survey comprehensively reviews the concept of algorithmic recourse, discussing its definitions, formulations, solutions, and future research directions, emphasizing its importance in ethical and fair AI decision-making.
Contribution
It unifies diverse definitions and approaches to algorithmic recourse and outlines future research challenges and connections to ethical issues.
Findings
Unified definitions and formulations of recourse
Overview of existing solution methods
Identification of future research directions
Abstract
Machine learning is increasingly used to inform decision-making in sensitive situations where decisions have consequential effects on individuals' lives. In these settings, in addition to requiring models to be accurate and robust, socially relevant values such as fairness, privacy, accountability, and explainability play an important role for the adoption and impact of said technologies. In this work, we focus on algorithmic recourse, which is concerned with providing explanations and recommendations to individuals who are unfavourably treated by automated decision-making systems. We first perform an extensive literature review, and align the efforts of many authors by presenting unified definitions, formulations, and solutions to recourse. Then, we provide an overview of the prospective research directions towards which the community may engage, challenging existing assumptions and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
