TL;DR
This paper introduces TRANSCENDENT, a rejection framework based on conformal prediction theory, to improve malware classification robustness against concept drift, outperforming existing methods and providing practical deployment insights.
Contribution
It formalizes and refines the Transcend strategy, develops more efficient conformal evaluators, and demonstrates superior performance in real-world malware datasets.
Findings
TRANSCENDENT outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
It generalizes across malware domains and classifiers.
Provides optimal operational settings for deployment.
Abstract
Machine learning for malware classification shows encouraging results, but real deployments suffer from performance degradation as malware authors adapt their techniques to evade detection. This phenomenon, known as concept drift, occurs as new malware examples evolve and become less and less like the original training examples. One promising method to cope with concept drift is classification with rejection in which examples that are likely to be misclassified are instead quarantined until they can be expertly analyzed. We propose TRANSCENDENT, a rejection framework built on Transcend, a recently proposed strategy based on conformal prediction theory. In particular, we provide a formal treatment of Transcend, enabling us to refine conformal evaluation theory -- its underlying statistical engine -- and gain a better understanding of the theoretical reasons for its effectiveness. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
