A signal detection model for quantifying over-regularization in non-linear image reconstruction
Emil Y. Sidky, John Paul Phillips, Weimin Zhou, Greg Ongie, Juan, Cruz-Bastida, Ingrid S. Reiser, Mark A. Anastasio, and Xiaochuan Pan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a signal detection-based image quality metric to better evaluate fine details in non-linear image reconstruction, addressing limitations of traditional global fidelity metrics like RMSE.
Contribution
A novel signal detection metric is developed to quantify over-regularization effects in non-linear image reconstruction, providing a complementary assessment to RMSE.
Findings
Signal detectability correlates with image quality and over-regularization effects.
The metric detects loss of fine details better than RMSE.
Using both metrics improves reconstruction parameter selection.
Abstract
Purpose: Many useful image quality metrics for evaluating linear image reconstruction techniques do not apply to or are difficult to interpret for non-linear image reconstruction. The vast majority of metrics employed for evaluating non-linear image reconstruction are based on some form of global image fidelity, such as image root mean square error (RMSE). Use of such metrics can lead to over-regularization in the sense that they can favor removal of subtle details in the image. To address this shortcoming, we develop an image quality metric based on signal detection that serves as a surrogate to the qualitative loss of fine image details. Methods: The metric is demonstrated in the context of a breast CT simulation, where different equal-dose configurations are considered. The configurations differ in the number of projections acquired. Image reconstruction is performed with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
