To Act or not to Act? Political competition in the presence of a threat
Arthur Fishman, Doron Klunover

TL;DR
This paper develops a model of political competition where incumbents decide whether to implement costly policies to prevent potential threats, analyzing strategic interactions under threat scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a novel theoretical framework modeling incumbent decision-making in the presence of threats and costly policy measures.
Findings
Incumbents are more likely to act when threats are imminent.
Costly policies can serve as signals of commitment or strength.
The model predicts strategic delays or actions based on threat perception.
Abstract
We present a model of political competition in which an incumbent politician, may implement a costly policy to prevent a possible threat to, for example, national security or a natural disaster.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
