Two attacks and counterattacks on the mutual semi-quantum key agreement protocol using Bell states
Jun Gu, Tzonelih Hwang

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a semi-quantum key agreement protocol using Bell states, revealing vulnerabilities where the classical participant can manipulate the key, and proposes an improved method to prevent this manipulation.
Contribution
The paper identifies security flaws in Yan et al.'s protocol and introduces an improved method to ensure fair key sharing between quantum and classical participants.
Findings
Classical participant can manipulate the shared key undetected
Two attacks demonstrate vulnerabilities in the original protocol
An improved protocol counteracts the identified attacks
Abstract
Recently, a mutual semi-quantum key agreement protocol using Bell states is proposed by Yan et al. (Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 34, 1950294, 2019). The proposed protocol tries to help a quantum participant share a key with a classical participant who just has limited quantum capacities. Yan et al. claimed that both the participants have the same influence on the final shared key. However, this study points out that the classical participant can manipulate the final shared key by himself/herself without being detected. To solve this problem, an improved method is proposed here.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
