Mixed vs Stable Anti-Yetter-Drinfeld Contramodule
Ilya Shapiro

TL;DR
This paper investigates the differences between mixed and stable anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules in the context of cyclic homology, demonstrating that these two categories are not equivalent through an example involving Sweedler's Hopf algebra.
Contribution
It provides a concrete example showing the non-equivalence of mixed and stable anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules, clarifying their distinct roles in cyclic homology.
Findings
Mixed complexes in stable anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules are not equivalent to mixed anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules.
Sweedler's Hopf algebra serves as a counterexample illustrating the difference.
The categories have distinct differential graded structures.
Abstract
We examine the cyclic homology of the monoidal category of modules over a finite dimensional Hopf algebra, motivated by the need to demonstrate that there is a difference between the recently introduced mixed anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules and the usual stable anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules. Namely, we show that Sweedler's Hopf algebra provides an example where mixed complexes in the category of stable anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules (previously studied) are not equivalent, as differential graded categories to the category of mixed anti-Yetter-Drinfeld contramodules (recently introduced).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
