Synthetic line and continuum observations of simulated turbulent clouds: the apparent widths of filaments
F. D. Priestley, A. P. Whitworth

TL;DR
This study uses synthetic observations from simulations to analyze filament widths in molecular clouds, finding that line emission affects apparent widths and that observed universal widths are consistent with models when accounting for physical conditions.
Contribution
The paper introduces a detailed post-processing method combining chemical networks and radiative transfer to compare simulated filaments with observations, clarifying the impact of line emission on filament width measurements.
Findings
Filaments have a true width of ~0.1 pc in surface density and dust emission maps.
Line emission maps show larger apparent widths due to poor correlation with surface density.
Dense-gas tracers reveal filament widths consistent with Herschel observations when accounting for physical effects.
Abstract
Filamentary structures are ubiquitous in observations of real molecular clouds, and also in simulations of turbulent, self-gravitating gas. However, making comparisons between observations and simulations is complicated by the difficulty of estimating volume-densities observationally. Here, we have post-processed hydrodynamical simulations of a turbulent isothermal molecular cloud, using a full time-dependent chemical network. We have then run radiative transfer models to obtain synthetic line and continuum intensities that can be compared directly with those observed. We find that filaments have a characteristic width of , both on maps of their true surface density, and on maps of their dust-continuum emission, in agreement with previous work. On maps of line emission from CO isotopologues, the apparent widths of filaments are typically…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
