Reflectionless excitation of arbitrary photonic structures: A general theory
A. Douglas Stone, William R. Sweeney, Chia Wei Hsu, Kabish, Wisal, Zeyu Wang

TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive theory for achieving reflectionless excitation of arbitrary photonic structures by tuning parameters to align complex-frequency solutions called R-zeros with real frequencies, enabling perfect impedance matching.
Contribution
It introduces a general theoretical framework for reflectionless excitation in photonic structures, including conditions for tuning parameters and the role of symmetries, expanding understanding of reflectionless states.
Findings
Reflectionless states can be achieved by tuning structural parameters.
Symmetries can naturally produce reflectionless states without tuning.
The theory predicts symmetry-breaking transitions related to exceptional points.
Abstract
We outline a recently developed theory of impedance-matching, or reflectionless excitation of arbitrary finite photonic structures in any dimension. It describes the necessary and sufficient conditions for perfectly reflectionless excitation to be possible, and specifies how many physical parameters must be tuned to achieve this. In the absence of geometric symmetries the tuning of at least one structural parameter will be necessary to achieve reflectionless excitation. The theory employs a recently identified set of complex-frequency solutions of the Maxwell equations as a starting point, which are defined by having zero reflection into a chosen set of input channels, and which are referred to as R-zeros. Tuning is generically necessary in order to move an R-zero to the real-frequency axis, where it becomes a physical steady-state solution, referred to as a Reflectionless Scattering…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
