Is there enough star formation in simulated protoclusters?
Seunghwan Lim, Douglas Scott, Arif Babul, David Barnes, Scott Kay, Ian, McCarthy, Douglas Rennehan, Mark Vogelsberger

TL;DR
This study reveals that current galaxy-formation models underestimate star formation rates in protoclusters by an order of magnitude, highlighting the need for improved modeling of star formation efficiency at high redshifts.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that existing models underpredict star formation in protoclusters and identifies resolution effects as a key factor, providing new insights into high-redshift galaxy formation.
Findings
Models underestimate protocluster SFRs by ~10x.
Star-formation efficiency is higher than predicted.
Resolution impacts SFR predictions significantly.
Abstract
As progenitors of the most massive objects, protoclusters are key to tracing the evolution and star-formation history of the Universe, and are responsible for per cent of the cosmic star formation at . Using a combination of state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations and empirical models, we show that current galaxy-formation models do not produce enough star formation in protoclusters to match observations. We find that the star-formation rates (SFRs) predicted from the models are an order of magnitude lower than what is seen in observations, despite the relatively good agreement found for their mass-accretion histories, specifically that they lie on an evolutionary path to become Coma-like clusters at . Using a well-studied protocluster core at as a test case, we find that star-formation efficiency of protocluster galaxies is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
