Dealing with multiple testing: To adjust or not to adjust
Yudi Pawitan, Arvid Sj\"olander

TL;DR
This paper discusses the logical considerations and debates surrounding whether to apply adjustments for multiple testing in scientific studies, emphasizing conceptual issues over specific methods.
Contribution
It critically examines the reasoning behind multiple testing adjustments, highlighting the importance of logical clarity in their application.
Findings
Highlights the importance of logical reasoning in multiple testing decisions
Questions the automatic application of adjustments without context
Encourages careful consideration of when adjustments are appropriate
Abstract
Multiple testing problems arise naturally in scientific studies because of the need to capture or convey more information with more variables. The literature is enormous, but the emphasis is primarily methodological, providing numerous methods with their mathematical justification and practical implementation. Our aim is to highlight the logical issues involved in the application of multiple testing adjustment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
