Quantitative comparison of the magnetic proximity effect in Pt detected by XRMR and XMCD
Dominik Graulich, Jan Krieft, Anastasiia Moskaltsova, Johannes Demir,, Tobias Peters, Tobias Pohlmann, Florian Bertram, Joachim Wollschl\"ager, Jose, R. L. Mardegan, Sonia Francoual, Timo Kuschel

TL;DR
This study compares XRMR and XMCD techniques for measuring the magnetic proximity effect in platinum, demonstrating their quantitative agreement and validating XRMR as a reliable method for analyzing spin depth profiles at magnetic interfaces.
Contribution
It provides a systematic quantitative comparison of XRMR and XMCD on the same samples, confirming XRMR's reliability for spintronic interface analysis.
Findings
XRMR and XMCD results are in very good agreement.
XRMR provides reliable spin depth profiles.
Quantitative analysis confirms XRMR's effectiveness.
Abstract
X-ray resonant magnetic reflectivity (XRMR) allows for the simultaneous measurement of structural, optical and magnetooptic properties and depth profiles of a variety of thin film samples. However, a same-beamtime same-sample systematic quantitative comparison of the magnetic properties observed with XRMR and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) is still pending. Here, the XRMR results (Pt L absorption edge) for the magnetic proximity effect in Pt deposited on the two different ferromagnetic materials Fe and CoFe are compared with quantitatively analyzed XMCD results. The obtained results are in very good quantitative agreement between the absorption-based (XMCD) and reflectivity-based (XRMR) techniques taking into account an ab initio calculated magnetooptic conversion factor for the XRMR analysis. Thus, it is shown that XRMR provides quantitative reliable spin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
