Comparing Bennequin-type inequalities
Elaina Aceves, Keiko Kawamuro, Linh Truong

TL;DR
This paper compares various Bennequin-type inequalities, demonstrating that while some bounds are sharp, the difference between self-linking number and four-ball genus can grow arbitrarily large, highlighting limitations of certain inequalities.
Contribution
It provides examples showing the disparity between self-linking number and four-ball genus, and compares the sharpness of different Bennequin-type inequalities.
Findings
Examples where the difference between self-linking number and four-ball genus is arbitrarily large.
The $s$-Bennequin and $ au$-Bennequin inequalities are sharp in the provided examples.
The slice-Bennequin inequality can be far from sharp in certain cases.
Abstract
The slice-Bennequin inequality states an upper bound for the self-linking number of a knot in terms of its four-ball genus. The -Bennequin and -Bennequin inequalities provide upper bounds on the self-linking number of a knot in terms of the Rasmussen invariant and the Ozsv\'ath-Szab\'o invariant. We exhibit examples in which the difference between self-linking number and four-ball genus grows arbitrarily large, whereas the -Bennequin inequality and the -Bennequin inequality are both sharp.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Connective tissue disorders research
