Planck constraints on the tensor-to-scalar ratio
M. Tristram, A. J. Banday, K. M. G\'orski, R. Keskitalo, C. R., Lawrence, K. J. Andersen, R. B. Barreiro, J. Borrill, H. K. Eriksen, R., Fernandez-Cobos, T. S. Kisner, E. Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez, B. Partridge, D., Scott, T. L. Svalheim, H. Thommesen, and I. K. Wehus

TL;DR
This paper uses Planck data to constrain the tensor-to-scalar ratio r, providing tighter limits through polarization and temperature spectra analysis, and combining with other datasets, to inform models of cosmic inflation.
Contribution
First comprehensive analysis of Planck PR4 data constraining r using polarization BB spectrum, improving limits and consistency checks with temperature data and external experiments.
Findings
Planck BB spectrum constrains r<0.069 at 95% confidence.
Combined Planck data yields r<0.056, tighter than previous limits.
Including BICEP2/Keck data further tightens the constraint to r<0.044.
Abstract
We present constraints on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r using Planck data. We use the latest release of Planck maps (PR4), processed with the NPIPE code, which produces calibrated frequency maps in temperature and polarization for all Planck channels from 30 GHz to 857 GHz using the same pipeline. We computed constraints on r using the BB angular power spectrum, and we also discuss constraints coming from the TT spectrum. Given Planck's noise level, the TT spectrum gives constraints on r that are cosmic-variance limited (with (r)=0.093), but we show that the marginalized posterior peaks towards negative values of r at about the 1.2 level. We derived Planck constraints using the BB power spectrum at both large angular scales (the 'reionization bump') and intermediate angular scales (the 'recombination bump') from =2 to 150, and find a stronger constraint than that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
