Refining the transit timing and photometric analysis of TRAPPIST-1: Masses, radii, densities, dynamics, and ephemerides
Eric Agol, Caroline Dorn, Simon L. Grimm, Martin Turbet, Elsa Ducrot,, Laetitia Delrez, Michael Gillon, Brice-Olivier Demory, Artem Burdanov, Khalid, Barkaoui, Zouhair Benkhaldoun, Emeline Bolmont, Adam Burgasser, Sean Carey,, Julien de Wit, Daniel Fabrycky

TL;DR
This study refines the masses, densities, and orbital dynamics of the TRAPPIST-1 system using four years of transit data, revealing a mostly rocky composition and extremely stable, coplanar orbits, with implications for planetary formation.
Contribution
It provides the most precise planetary mass and density measurements to date for TRAPPIST-1, and offers new insights into its composition and orbital stability using comprehensive transit and dynamical analysis.
Findings
All seven planets have densities consistent with a rocky composition depleted in iron.
Planet masses are measured with 3-5% precision, surpassing current radial velocity capabilities.
The system's orbits are extremely coplanar and stable over 10 million years.
Abstract
We have collected transit times for the TRAPPIST-1 system with the Spitzer Space Telescope over four years. We add to these ground-based, HST and K2 transit time measurements, and revisit an N-body dynamical analysis of the seven-planet system using our complete set of times from which we refine the mass ratios of the planets to the star. We next carry out a photodynamical analysis of the Spitzer light curves to derive the density of the host star and the planet densities. We find that all seven planets' densities may be described with a single rocky mass-radius relation which is depleted in iron relative to Earth, with Fe 21 wt% versus 32 wt% for Earth, and otherwise Earth-like in composition. Alternatively, the planets may have an Earth-like composition, but enhanced in light elements, such as a surface water layer or a core-free structure with oxidized iron in the mantle. We measure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
