Debunking Rumors in Networks
Luca P. Merlino, Paolo Pin, Nicole Tabasso

TL;DR
This paper models how true and false messages spread in social networks, showing that verification incentives and network homophily influence rumor persistence and that verification policies can reduce rumors.
Contribution
It introduces a new model of rumor diffusion incorporating costly verification and analyzes how verification incentives affect rumor survival.
Findings
Verification incentives promote rumor debunking.
Homophily's impact depends on verification processes.
Communication intensity alone does not affect rumor prevalence.
Abstract
We study the diffusion of a true and a false message (the rumor) in a social network. Upon hearing a message, individuals may believe it, disbelieve it, or debunk it through costly verification. Whenever the truth survives in steady state, so does the rumor. Communication intensity in itself is irrelevant for relative rumor prevalence, and the effect of homophily depends on the exact verification process and equilibrium verification rates. Our model highlights that successful policies in the fight against rumors increase individuals' incentives to verify.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsDiffusion
