Pulse Shape Discrimination of CsI(Tl) with a Photomultiplier Tube and MPPCs
Nguyen V. H. Viet, M. Nomachi, K. Takahisa, T. Shima, B. T. Khai, R., Takaishi, and K. Miyamoto

TL;DR
This study compares pulse shape discrimination performance of MPPCs and PMTs with CsI(Tl) scintillators, showing PMTs generally perform better but MPPCs can improve with extended data acquisition and optimized gating.
Contribution
It introduces a new data acquisition system that enhances MPPC-based PSD performance and estimates optimal short time-gates for effective discrimination.
Findings
PMTs generate more photoelectrons than MPPCs in the setup.
Extending the time-gate improves MPPC PSD performance significantly.
Optimal short time-gates can be estimated for effective PSD without extensive analysis.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluate and compare the pulse shape discrimination (PSD) performance of multipixel photon counters (MPPCs, also known as silicon photomultiphers - SiPMs) with that of a typical photomultiplier tube (PMT) when testing using CsI(Tl) scintillators. We use the charge comparison method, whereby we discriminate different types of particles by the ratio of charges integrated within two time-gates (the delayed part and the entire digitized waveform). For a satisfactory PSD performance, a setup should generate many photoelectrons (p.e.) and collect their charges efficiently. The PMT setup generates more p.e. than the MPPC setup does. With the same digitizer and the same long time-gate (the entire digitized waveform), the PMT setup is also better in charge collection. Therefore, the PMT setup demonstrates better PSD performance. We subsequently test the MPPC setup using a new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
