Modifying the Symbolic Aggregate Approximation Method to Capture Segment Trend Information

TL;DR

This paper proposes three simple modifications to the SAX method to incorporate trend information while maintaining its efficiency and exactness, demonstrating improved classification performance on diverse datasets.

Contribution

It introduces three novel SAX modifications that capture segment trends without sacrificing SAX's core advantages.

Findings

One modification outperforms classic-SAX in classification accuracy.

Another modification slightly improves over classic-SAX.

All modifications retain SAX's efficiency and exactness.

Abstract

The Symbolic Aggregate approXimation (SAX) is a very popular symbolic dimensionality reduction technique of time series data, as it has several advantages over other dimensionality reduction techniques. One of its major advantages is its efficiency, as it uses precomputed distances. The other main advantage is that in SAX the distance measure defined on the reduced space lower bounds the distance measure defined on the original space. This enables SAX to return exact results in query-by-content tasks. Yet SAX has an inherent drawback, which is its inability to capture segment trend information. Several researchers have attempted to enhance SAX by proposing modifications to include trend information. However, this comes at the expense of giving up on one or more of the advantages of SAX. In this paper we investigate three modifications of SAX to add trend capturing ability to it. These modifications retain the same features of SAX in terms of simplicity, efficiency, as well as the exact results it returns. They are simple procedures based on a different segmentation of the time series than that used in classic-SAX. We test the performance of these three modifications on 45 time series datasets of different sizes, dimensions, and nature, on a classification task and we compare it to that of classic-SAX. The results we obtained show that one of these modifications manages to outperform classic-SAX and that another one slightly gives better results than classic-SAX.