A Review of Gas-Surface Interaction Models for Orbital Aerodynamics Applications
Sabrina Livadiotti, Nicholas H. Crisp, Peter C.E. Roberts, Stephen D., Worrall, Vitor T.A. Oiko, Steve Edmondson, Sarah J. Haigh, Claire Huyton,, Katharine L. Smith, Luciana A. Sinpetru, Brandon E. A. Holmes, Jonathan, Becedas, Rosa Mar\'ia Dom\'inguez, Valent\'in Ca\~nas

TL;DR
This paper reviews popular gas-surface interaction models used in orbital aerodynamics, comparing their accuracy, complexity, and suitability for low Earth orbit applications, and discusses future challenges in the field.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of physical and scattering kernel gas-surface interaction models relevant to orbital aerodynamics, highlighting their advantages and limitations.
Findings
Physical models like Hard Cube, Soft Cube, Washboard are simpler and faster.
Scattering kernel models such as Maxwell, Nocilla-Hurlbut-Sherman, Cercignani-Lampis-Lord offer different accuracy levels.
Most models balance complexity and computational efficiency for space engineering applications.
Abstract
Renewed interest in Very Low Earth Orbits (VLEO) - i.e. altitudes below 450 km - has led to an increased demand for accurate environment characterisation and aerodynamic force prediction. While the former requires knowledge of the mechanisms that drive density variations in the thermosphere, the latter also depends on the interactions between the gas-particles in the residual atmosphere and the surfaces exposed to the flow. The determination of the aerodynamic coefficients is hindered by the numerous uncertainties that characterise the physical processes occurring at the exposed surfaces. Several models have been produced over the last 60 years with the intent of combining accuracy with relatively simple implementations. In this paper the most popular models have been selected and reviewed using as discriminating factors relevance with regards to orbital aerodynamics applications and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
