Influence of fast emissions and statistical de-excitation on the isospin transport ratio
A. Camaiani, S. Piantelli, A. Ono, G. Casini, B. Borderie, R., Bougault, C. Ciampi, J.A. Duenas, C. Frosin, J. D. Frankland, D. Gruyer, N., LeNeindre, I. Lombardo, G. Mantovani, P. Ottanelli, M. Parlog, G. Pasquali,, S. Upadhyaya, S. Valdr\'e, G. Verde, and E. Vient

TL;DR
This study investigates how fast emissions and statistical de-excitation affect the isospin transport ratio in heavy-ion collisions, revealing that these processes can introduce non-linearities that challenge the ratio's assumed robustness.
Contribution
The paper critically examines the validity of the isospin transport ratio as a probe by analyzing the effects of fast emissions and statistical decay using transport and decay models.
Findings
Statistical de-excitation causes linear transformations at high excitation energies.
Fast emissions introduce non-linear effects on the isospin ratio.
Non-linearities are significant at excitation energies below 2 MeV.
Abstract
Isospin transport ratio is a powerful method to estimate the neutron-proton (n-p) equilibration in heavy-ion collisions, and extensively used to obtain information on the asy-stiffness of the nuclear Equation of State. In fact such a ratio is expected to bypass any perturbations introducing a linear transformation of the chosen observable. In particular, it is supposed to overcome contributions due to emission, either of dynamical or statistical nature, from the primary fragments formed during the collisions. In this paper we explore the validity of this assumption, looking at the quasi-projectile n-p ratio () in peripheral and semi-peripheral events for Ca+Ca reactions at 35\amev{}, simulated via the Antisymmetrized Molecular Dynamics transport model, coupled to different statistical decay codes. The statistical de-excitation of the primary fragments introduces a linear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
