The Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser Leaves No Choice
Tabish Qureshi

TL;DR
This paper theoretically analyzes a delayed-choice quantum eraser setup, demonstrating that the experiment inherently erases which-way information, leaving no choice for the experimenter, and highlights the role of mutually unbiased bases in the process.
Contribution
It shows that in the delayed-choice quantum eraser, which-way information is always erased, and emphasizes the importance of mutually unbiased bases, providing a new understanding of the experiment's fundamental nature.
Findings
The delayed mode leaves no choice for the experimenter.
Which-way information is always erased in the setup.
Mutually unbiased bases play a crucial role in the process.
Abstract
A realizable delayed-choice quantum eraser, using a modified Mach-Zehnder (MZ) interferometer and polarization entangled photons, is theoretically analyzed here. The signal photon goes through a modified MZ interferometer, and the polarization of the idler photon provides path information for the signal photon. The setup is very similar to the delayed-choice quantum eraser experimentally studied by the Vienna group. In the class of quantum erasers with discrete output states, it is easy to see that the delayed mode leaves no choice for the experimenter. The which-way information is always erased, and every detected signal photon fixes the polarization state of the idler, and thus gives information on precisely how the signal photon traversed the two paths. The analysis shows that the Vienna delayed-choice quantum eraser is the first experimental demonstration of the fact that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
