A significant excess in major merger rate for AGNs with the highest Eddington ratios at z<0.2
V. Marian, K. Jahnke, I. Andika, E. Banados, V.N. Bennert, S. Cohen,, B. Husemann, M. Kaasinen, A.M. Koekemoer, M. Mechtley, M. Onoue, J.T., Schindler, M. Schramm, A. Schulze, J.D. Silverman, I. Smirnova-Pinchukova, A., van der Wel, C. Villforth, R.A. Windhorst

TL;DR
This study finds a significant excess of major merger activity in AGN host galaxies with high Eddington ratios at low redshift, suggesting mergers play a key role in triggering these luminous AGNs.
Contribution
It provides new observational evidence linking major mergers to high Eddington ratio AGNs at z<0.2, expanding previous studies from higher redshift.
Findings
AGN hosts have a merger fraction of 0.41 ± 0.12.
Inactive galaxies have a merger fraction of 0.08 ± 0.06.
Major mergers are significantly more common in high Eddington ratio AGNs.
Abstract
Observational studies are increasingly finding evidence against major mergers being the dominant mechanism responsible for triggering AGN. After studying the connection between major mergers and AGN with the highest Eddington ratios at z=2, we here expand our analysis to z<0.2, exploring the same AGN parameter space. Using ESO VLT/FORS2 B-, V- and color images, we examine the morphologies of 17 galaxies hosting AGNs with Eddington ratios >0.3, and 25 mass- and redshift-matched control galaxies. To match the appearance of the two samples, we add synthetic point sources to the inactive comparison galaxies. The combined sample of AGN and inactive galaxies was independently ranked by 19 experts with respect to the degree of morphological distortion. We combine the resulting individual rankings into multiple overall rankings, from which we derive the respective major merger fractions of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
