Learning and Strongly Truthful Multi-Task Peer Prediction: A Variational Approach
Grant Schoenebeck, Fang-Yi Yu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a variational approach to design strongly truthful peer prediction mechanisms for multi-task settings, leveraging learning to handle continuous signals and noisy data, with theoretical guarantees on the number of tasks needed.
Contribution
It proposes a novel variational framework that reduces mechanism design to learning an ideal scoring function, enabling strong truthfulness guarantees in complex multi-task peer prediction scenarios.
Findings
First peer prediction mechanism for continuous signals in multi-task settings.
Mechanisms achieve epsilon-strong truthfulness with fewer tasks under various priors.
Applicable to noisy signals and finite signal spaces with maximal prior relevance.
Abstract
Peer prediction mechanisms incentivize agents to truthfully report their signals even in the absence of verification by comparing agents' reports with those of their peers. In the detail-free multi-task setting, agents respond to multiple independent and identically distributed tasks, and the mechanism does not know the prior distribution of agents' signals. The goal is to provide an -strongly truthful mechanism where truth-telling rewards agents "strictly" more than any other strategy profile (with additive error), and to do so while requiring as few tasks as possible. We design a family of mechanisms with a scoring function that maps a pair of reports to a score. The mechanism is strongly truthful if the scoring function is "prior ideal," and -strongly truthful as long as the scoring function is sufficiently close to the ideal one. This reduces the above…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
