Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
Sharon Chiang, Ankit N. Khambhati, Emily T. Wang, Marina Vannucci,, Edward F. Chang, Vikram R. Rao

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure control varies depending on the brain's cyclical seizure risk state, highlighting the importance of personalized stimulation strategies.
Contribution
It provides evidence that seizure risk states influence RNS effectiveness, informing personalized tuning of neurostimulation parameters based on underlying brain states.
Findings
Higher charge density improves seizure outcomes.
Stimulation frequency effects depend on initial seizure risk state.
Seizure risk fluctuations are linked to stimulation parameter efficacy.
Abstract
An implanted device for brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS System) is approved as an effective treatment to reduce seizures in adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Clinical trials of the RNS System demonstrate population-level reduction in average seizure frequency, but therapeutic response is highly variable. Recent evidence links seizures to cyclical fluctuations in underlying risk. We tested the hypothesis that effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation varies based on current state within cyclical risk fluctuations. We analyzed retrospective data from 25 adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy implanted with the RNS System. Chronic electrocorticography was used to record electrographic seizures, and hidden Markov models decoded seizures into fluctuations in underlying risk. State-dependent associations of RNS System stimulation parameters with changes in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
