Detection of Pb II in the Ultraviolet Spectra of Three Metal-Poor Stars
Ian U. Roederer, James E. Lawler, Erika M. Holmbeck, Timothy C. Beers,, Rana Ezzeddine, Anna Frebel, Terese T. Hansen, Inese I. Ivans, Amanda I., Karakas, Vinicius M. Placco, Charli M. Sakari

TL;DR
This study reports the first detection of Pb II in three metal-poor stars using Hubble ultraviolet spectra, revealing higher lead abundances than previously measured with Pb I lines and exploring implications for nucleosynthesis and stellar ages.
Contribution
It provides the first detection of Pb II lines in metal-poor stars, demonstrating their importance for accurate lead abundance measurements and nucleosynthesis insights.
Findings
Pb II lines yield higher Pb abundances than Pb I lines.
Pb is significantly enhanced in s-process-enriched stars.
The Th/Pb ratio suggests an age of approximately 8 Gyr for the star HD 222925.
Abstract
We report the first detection of the Pb II line at 2203.534 Angstroms in three metal-poor stars, using ultraviolet spectra obtained with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph on board the Hubble Space Telescope. We perform a standard abundance analysis assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) to derive lead (Pb, Z=82) abundances. The Pb II line yields a higher abundance than Pb I lines by +0.36 +/- 0.34 dex and +0.49 +/- 0.28 dex in the stars HD 94028 and HD 196944, where Pb I lines had been detected previously. The Pb II line is likely formed in LTE, and these offsets affirm previous calculations showing that Pb I lines commonly used as abundance indicators underestimate the Pb abundance in LTE. Pb is enhanced in the s-process-enriched stars HD 94028 ([Pb/Fe] = +0.95 +/- 0.14) and HD 196944 ([Pb/Fe] = +2.28 +/- 0.23), and we show that Pb-208 is the dominant Pb isotope in these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
