TL;DR
This study evaluates different ensemble post-processing strategies for probabilistic wind power forecasts, demonstrating that post-processing the final wind power ensemble enhances forecast calibration and sharpness.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of ensemble post-processing strategies using EMOS, highlighting the benefits of post-processing the final wind power forecasts.
Findings
Post-processing the wind power ensemble improves forecast calibration.
Post-processing only weather ensembles does not significantly enhance forecast performance.
Two-step post-processing strategies yield better results than single-step approaches.
Abstract
Capturing the uncertainty in probabilistic wind power forecasts is challenging, especially when uncertain input variables, such as the weather, play a role. Since ensemble weather predictions aim to capture the uncertainty in the weather system, they can be used to propagate this uncertainty through to subsequent wind power forecasting models. However, as weather ensemble systems are known to be biased and underdispersed, meteorologists post-process the ensembles. This post-processing can successfully correct the biases in the weather variables but has not been evaluated thoroughly in the context of subsequent forecasts, such as wind power generation forecasts. The present paper evaluates multiple strategies for applying ensemble post-processing to probabilistic wind power forecasts. We use Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) as the post-processing method and evaluate four possible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
