An observational argument against accretion in magnetars
Victor Doroshenko, Andrea Santangelo, Valery Suleimanov and, Sergey Tsygankov

TL;DR
This paper presents observational evidence against the accretion model for magnetars by analyzing their X-ray variability and comparing it with accreting systems, supporting the magnetic decay paradigm.
Contribution
It provides the first direct observational argument against accretion powering magnetars based on their lack of expected variability.
Findings
Magnetars show no aperiodic variability typical of accreting sources.
Comparison with accreting systems reveals distinct variability patterns.
Results support magnetic field decay as the primary energy source for magnetars.
Abstract
The phenomenology of anomalous X-ray pulsars is usually interpreted within the paradigm of very highly magnetized neutron stars, also known as magnetars. According to this paradigm, the persistent emission of anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) is powered by the decay of the magnetic field. However, an alternative scenario in which the persistent emission is explained through accretion is also discussed in literature. In particular AXP 4U 0142+61has been suggested to be either an accreting neutron star or a white dwarf. Here we rule out this scenario based on the the observed X-ray variability properties of the source. We directly compare the observed power spectra of 4U 0142+61 and of two other magnetars, 1RXS J170849.0400910 and 1E 1841-045 with that of the X-ray pulsar 1A 0535+262, and of the intermediate polar GK Persei. In addition, we include a bright young radio pulsar PSR B1509-58…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
