The IRX-$\beta$ relation of high-redshift galaxies
Lichen Liang, Robert Feldmann, Christopher C. Hayward, Desika, Narayanan, Onur \c{C}atmabacak, Du\v{s}an Kere\v{s}, Claude-Andr\'e, Faucher-Gigu\`ere, Philip F. Hopkins

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution cosmological simulations to analyze the IRX-$eta_{ m UV}$ relation in high-redshift galaxies, revealing its dependence on dust geometry, stellar properties, and viewing angle, and challenging previous assumptions about dust extinction laws.
Contribution
It provides a detailed simulation-based analysis of the IRX-$eta_{ m UV}$ relation at high redshift, highlighting the role of dust geometry and intrinsic stellar properties in shaping the relation.
Findings
IRX correlates strongly with UV optical depth and dust-star geometry.
Scatter in the IRX-$eta_{ m UV}$ relation is mainly due to variations in intrinsic UV slope.
The IRX-$eta_{ m UV}$ relation at high redshift aligns with local galaxy observations.
Abstract
The relation between infrared excess (IRX) and UV spectral slope () is an empirical probe of dust properties of galaxies. The shape, scatter, and redshift evolution of this relation are not well understood, however, leading to uncertainties in estimating the dust content and star formation rates (SFRs) of galaxies at high redshift. In this study, we explore the nature and properties of the IRX- relation with a sample of galaxies () extracted from high-resolution cosmological simulations (MassiveFIRE) of the Feedback in Realistic Environments (FIRE) project. The galaxies in our sample show an IRX- relation that is in good agreement with the observed relation in nearby galaxies. IRX is tightly coupled to the UV optical depth, and is mainly determined by the dust-to-star geometry instead of total dust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
