TOI-811b and TOI-852b: New transiting brown dwarfs with similar masses and very different radii and ages from the TESS mission
Theron W. Carmichael, Samuel N. Quinn, George Zhou, Nolan Grieves,, Francois Bouchy, Karen A. Collins, John F. Kielkopf, Richard P. Schwarz,, Andrew M. Vanderburg, Jonathan M. Irwin, David Charbonneau, Carl Ziegler,, Cesar Briceno, Nicholas Law, Andrew W. Mann, Chelsea Huang

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of two transiting brown dwarfs with similar masses but very different radii and ages, providing key data to test substellar evolution models and age-related radius changes.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed characterization of two brown dwarfs with similar masses but contrasting ages, offering new empirical data for substellar mass-radius isochrones.
Findings
TOI-811b is a young, larger brown dwarf with a radius of 1.35 R_J.
TOI-852b is an older, smaller brown dwarf with a radius of 0.75 R_J.
Both objects serve as test points for substellar evolution models.
Abstract
We report the discovery of two transiting brown dwarfs (BDs), TOI-811b and TOI-852b, from NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite mission. These two transiting BDs have similar masses, but very different radii and ages. Their host stars have similar masses, effective temperatures, and metallicities. The younger and larger transiting BD is TOI-811b at a mass of and radius of and it orbits its host star in a period of days. Its age of Myr, which we derive from an application of gyrochronology to its host star, is why this BD's radius is relatively large, not heating from its host star since this BD orbits at a longer orbital period than most known transiting BDs. This constraint on the youth of TOI-811b allows us to test substellar mass-radius isochrones where the radius of BDs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
