Quantum-classical algorithms for skewed linear systems with optimized Hadamard test

TL;DR

This paper develops hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for skewed linear systems with quantum input models and optimizes the Hadamard test circuit depth, enabling more efficient quantum computations on near-term devices.

Contribution

It introduces algorithms with poly-logarithmic dependence on system dimension and optimizes the Hadamard test circuit depth for specific lattice geometries.

Findings

Algorithms have poly-logarithmic dependence on the dimension.

Optimized Hadamard test reduces circuit depth significantly.

Methods are asymptotically tight for one-depth circuits.

Abstract

The solving of linear systems provides a rich area to investigate the use of nearer-term, noisy, intermediate-scale quantum computers. In this work, we discuss hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for skewed linear systems for over-determined and under-determined cases. Our input model is such that the columns or rows of the matrix defining the linear system are given via quantum circuits of poly-logarithmic depth and the number of circuits is much smaller than their Hilbert space dimension. Our algorithms have poly-logarithmic dependence on the dimension and polynomial dependence in other natural quantities. In addition, we present an algorithm for the special case of a factorized linear system with run time poly-logarithmic in the respective dimensions. At the core of these algorithms is the Hadamard test and in the second part of this paper we consider the optimization of the circuit depth of this test. Given an $n$-qubit and $d$-depth quantum circuit $\mathcal{C}$, we can approximate $\langle 0|\mathcal{C}|0\rangle$ using $(n + s)$ qubits and $O\left(\log s + d\log (n/s) + d\right)$-depth quantum circuits, where $s\leq n$. In comparison, the standard implementation requires $n+1$ qubits and $O(dn)$ depth. Lattice geometries underlie recent quantum supremacy experiments with superconducting devices. We also optimize the Hadamard test for an $(l_1\times l_2)$ lattice with $l_1 \times l_2 = n$, and can approximate $\langle 0|\mathcal{C} |0\rangle$ with $(n + 1)$ qubits and $O\left(d \left(l_1 + l_2\right)\right)$-depth circuits. In comparison, the standard depth is $O\left(d n^2\right)$ in this setting. Both of our optimization methods are asymptotically tight in the case of one-depth quantum circuits $\mathcal{C}$.