Learning to Plan and Realize Separately for Open-Ended Dialogue Systems
Sashank Santhanam, Zhuo Cheng, Brodie Mather, Bonnie Dorr, Archna, Bhatia, Bryanna Hebenstreit, Alan Zemel, Adam Dalton, Tomek Strzalkowski and, Samira Shaikh

TL;DR
This paper proposes a two-phase approach for open-ended dialogue systems, separating planning and realization to improve conversational quality over traditional end-to-end models.
Contribution
It introduces a novel decoupled framework for dialogue generation, explicitly modeling human-like planning and realization processes.
Findings
Decoupling planning and realization outperforms end-to-end models in evaluations.
Human and automated assessments favor the two-phase approach.
The method enhances the naturalness and coherence of generated responses.
Abstract
Achieving true human-like ability to conduct a conversation remains an elusive goal for open-ended dialogue systems. We posit this is because extant approaches towards natural language generation (NLG) are typically construed as end-to-end architectures that do not adequately model human generation processes. To investigate, we decouple generation into two separate phases: planning and realization. In the planning phase, we train two planners to generate plans for response utterances. The realization phase uses response plans to produce an appropriate response. Through rigorous evaluations, both automated and human, we demonstrate that decoupling the process into planning and realization performs better than an end-to-end approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
