A Comparison of Rest-frame Ultraviolet and Optical Emission-Line Diagnostics in the Lensed Galaxy SDSS J1723+3411 at Redshift z=1.3293
J. R. Rigby, Michael Florian, A. Acharyya, Matthew Bayliss, Michael D., Gladders, Keren Sharon, Gabriel Brammer, Ivelina Momcheva, Stephanie LaMassa,, Fuyan Bian, H\r{a}kon Dahle, Traci Johnson, Lisa Kewley, Katherine Murray,, Katherine Whitaker, and Eva Wuyts

TL;DR
This study compares UV and optical emission-line diagnostics in a high-redshift lensed galaxy, revealing limitations of UV diagnostics for accurate metallicity and physical condition measurements, and emphasizing the importance of optical lines for future JWST surveys.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of UV and optical emission-line diagnostics in a z=1.3293 galaxy, highlighting the unreliability of UV-only diagnostics for physical condition estimates.
Findings
UV diagnostics often underestimate metallicity
UV diagnostics overestimate pressure
Optical lines provide more reliable physical conditions
Abstract
For the extremely bright lensed galaxy SDSS J1723+3411 at z=1.3293 , we analyze spatially integrated MMT, Keck, and Hubble Space Telescope spectra that fully cover the rest-frame wavelength range of 1400 to 7200 Angstroms. We also analyze near-IR spectra from Gemini that cover H alpha for a portion of the lensed arc. We report fluxes for 42 detected emission lines, and upper limits for an additional 22. This galaxy has extreme emission line ratios and high equivalent widths that are characteristic of extreme emission-line galaxies. We compute strong emission line diagnostics from both the rest-frame optical and rest-frame ultraviolet (UV), to constrain physical conditions and test the spectral diagnostics themselves. We tightly determine the nebular physical conditions using the most reliable diagnostics, and then compare to results from other diagnostics. We find disappointing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
